Buridan’s ass

Buridan’s ass is a philosophical thought that illustrates a paradox in the conception of free will.

Its a scenario involving  a hypothetical donkey (ass) that is equally hungry and thirsty.

It’s placed precisely midway between a stack of hay and a pail of water.

The paradox suggests that since the donkey has no reason to prefer one over the other, it cannot make a rational decision to choose either option.

Unable to choose the donkey would eventually die of both hunger and thirst.

The paradox in Buridan’s ass raises questions about:

1. Decision-making in situations of equal motivation 2. The nature of free will and determinism 3. The role of reason in moral choices

Animals and humans would likely not behave this way, as they would eventually make a choice based on environmental factors or random neural fluctuations.

It could be read as a warning against indecision, analysis paralysis.

It could promote the benefits of longer term thinking, and not to be short sited,

It suggests there is no free will.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *